A Most Engaging Meeting
To begin with, this was not an easy walk-in-the-park kind of proposal to work on. There were many considerations and principles to consider. Moreover, most of the people were also very passionate of their views on this matter as well.
As I reflected, there were few learnings points for me on why the meeting was possibly engaging and enjoyable.
Firstly, it was a level playing field where everyone was a stakeholder of the discussion. Every one was participative. There was no “hierarchal” kind of sentiments; be it real or perceived. Everyone in the meeting could and should contribute to the discussion. Every view and comment was welcome.
Secondly, no discussion, question or comment on the topic was off limits. There was nothing that we could not talk about openly. In meetings, we sometimes avoid certain issues that every one knows about but no one wants to talk about. It could be due to the fear of rocking the status quo too much, making some people uncomfortable, offending some people or being "blacklisted". The drawbacks would be the lack of progress and that real issues that needed to be discussed never get to be touched on.
Thirdly, the atmosphere was respectful and kind. Although the discussion were animated and pointed at times, the spirit was kind. It was issue-focused and not personal. There was a distinction between the ideas and views of the person versus the person. No one should feel devalued when their ideas and views were scrutinized or “attacked upon”. In fact, there was a healthy atmosphere where we laughed at ourselves too.
I am sure if I would to put my thoughts to it, there should be more learning points for me to glean.
Meeting is such a large part of many of our working and ministry life. The honest truth is that most of the meetings that we lead or sit in are less than engaging. I would be the first to plead guilty to leading many disengaging and unfruitful meetings. I want to do better in this department of my life.
At this moment, I am spending some time to learn from the book “Death By Meeting”. If you have read or learn from it, I would appreciate you sharing your ideas with me.
By the way, the guideline is still in the works. We want to be comprehensive in our coverage and rigorous in our guiding principles.